Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubyra1n

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[Rubyra1n]]=

:{{la|Rubyra1n}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Rubyra1n}})

Up and coming computer/phone application with no claim of notability. Article isn't even clear/certain if the tool was written by a notable hacker, although notability is not inherited. No references (has footnotes). A general Wikipedia is not a crystal ball nomination. v/r - T P 22:29, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Although this may be true, the possibility that such a product may exist in the very near future is very great. Therefore, I believe it is not right to remove the article quite yet.T

Weak delete. This resulted in more Ghits than I expected, but..."a possible up-coming jailbreaking tool"??? Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 07:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Delete When this tool actually appears, than this article can be recreated. Safiel (talk) 20:44, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Delete, zero third-party sources, WP:CRYSTAL. --Kinu ^t/_c 09:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. "possible up-coming..." "if proven to be real..." "most likely will be..." "this IRC chat was later proved to be fake..." There is nothing solid here at all. Wikipedia is not for vague rumours. JohnCD (talk) 19:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.