Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rules of the Death Note
=[[Rules of the Death Note]]=
:{{la|Rules of the Death Note}} –
- Comment. Not sure what I think about this matter. My first thought, when I saw it pop up on my watchlist, almost ready for its deletion debate, was that it needs sourcing and some real-world impact, thus my "vote" was going to be Keep. Now, however, I want to see what others have to say about this article's fate before, or if, I cast my "vote". Flyer22 (talk) 05:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: Mostly on the basis that it is complete plot information, which is completely unsouced. If this is so important it should be merged into the main article. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:14, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable part of a fictional universe and I doubt enough secondary sources could be found to satisfy WP:FICT. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 08:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, main article already covers this. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 09:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Mostly fancruft and trivia type stuff that fails multiple guidelines as already noted. Collectonian (talk) 09:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:FICT and is mostly original research and trivia as well. --Farix (Talk) 12:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The summary of the rules in the main Death Note article should be sufficient. KyuuA4 (talk) 09:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as per all of the above, including WP:NOR, WP:NOT#IINFO, WP:FANCRUFT and WP:TRIVIA. Greg Jones II 21:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Farix (Duane543 04:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC))
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. -- Hiding T 17:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.