Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian Defense League

=[[Russian Defense League]]=

:{{la|Russian Defense League}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Russian_Defense_League Stats])

:({{Find sources|Russian Defense League}})

Only mentions are in primary sources such as tumblr, discussion forums, YouTube pronouncements, etc. No neutral/objective evidence that this group has any political impact. MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:00, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 04:02, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


  • Delete - my findings were similar to the original posters. --Nat Gertler (talk) 04:29, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete. The Russian name of the organization is Лига Защиты России [http://vk.com/public37429657] (Vkontakte) and it seems to be not notable [https://www.google.cz/search?q=%22%D0%9B%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B0+%D0%97%D0%B0%D1%89%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8B+%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B8%22&btnG=Hledat&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla%3Acs%3Aofficial&client=firefox-a]. I've removed the only external link, claiming to be the official website of the organization, as it is (in my opinion) an attack site/blog. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 04:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete - I didn't spot anything counting towards GNG in my quick run-through, not even enough for basic verification. I believe in the lowest of low bars for political parties, their leaders, and their youth sections regardless of ideology, however, so the closing administrator should feel free to toss this opinion aside if anything surfaces below. Carrite (talk) 16:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete - doesn't seem to meet WP:NOTABILITY and the only source is a notification that yes, this organization has a president. APerson241 (talk!) 19:58, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete - per above. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 20:28, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.