Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Minch

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Billings Gazette. Mkdwtalk 19:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

=[[Ryan Minch]]=

:{{la|Ryan Minch}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ryan_Minch Stats])

:({{Find sources|Ryan Minch}})

BLP with only one source. I'm not finding any indication that the writer passes WP:ANYBIO or WP:AUTHOR. ALH (talk) 21:01, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:32, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:33, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep Came to this conclusion after some thought. While normally I'd agree that the subject has not achieved the level of notability that we like to see, I've found that there are a couple of articles on Wikipedia where he is a reference for that article--and by looking around, I believe that there is potential for more of the same. It then stands to reason (at least for me) that a stub article about the author is a "good" thing as it provides details about the sources of other articles. WP:ANYBIO and WP:AUTHOR are guidelines not policy (good ones at that) but I think there is a reason to ignore them in this case. I think it would be good for Wikipedia.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 04:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Redirect to Billings Gazette unless a bit more is found, merging in a sentence or two at that article would address some of the issue Paul McDonald properly raises. --j⚛e deckertalk 18:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
  • No objection, that is a good alternative with me.--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.