Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S&T Motiv

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Out-of-process disruptive nomination. See WP:ANI#User:Scope_creep_Revenge_and_disruptive_editing (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:24, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

=[[:S&T Motiv]]=

:{{la|S&T Motiv}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/S%26T_Motiv Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|S&T Motiv}})

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:SIGCOV. No coverage whatsoever. References are press releases and profile page on Janes trade book. scope_creep^Talk 12:53, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.Mztourist (talk) 12:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.Mztourist (talk) 12:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Keep primary small arms supplier to the South Korean military all well referenced. A clear case of WP:REVENGE by nominator User:scope_creep as signposted here: User talk:Mztourist#Articles to Afd. Mztourist (talk) 12:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

::There is no coverage whatsoever. You have used blog references and press releases to support the inclusion of the article. You audited the articles I wrote, I'm doing the same your articles. It is only fair. scope_creep^Talk 12:57, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Keep. Anything from the publisher of Jane's Fighting Ships is a reliable source. Small Arms Defence Journal also appears to be a reliable source. While the SADJ article gives a 404 error, it appears to have been a staff-written report about the firm in the context of a significant trade show. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:23, 16 January 2020 (UTC) Also, see [https://www.google.com/search?q=S%26T%EB%AA%A8%ED%8B%B0%EB%B8%8C&sxsrf=ACYBGNQUPK6F9Vx-B9A4MvckKG2-e7L9VA:1579181276167&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj50YHYnIjnAhUSXK0KHR78Ad8Q_AUoA3oECBMQBQ&biw=1920&bih=937 this search] for the company's Korean name. In general, a company traded on a stock exchange is likely to be the subject of coverage in reliable sources, but some of the coverage of any South Korean company will be in Korean. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:32, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.