Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIS (file format)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Symbian#Design. plicit 14:23, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

=[[:SIS (file format)]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=SIS (file format)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=SIS (file format)}})

Fails WP:GNG Clenpr (talk) 14:30, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Keep - notable. I just added 4 references found using the Google Scholar and Google Books link on this page above. --A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 23:58, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Symbian, without prejudice of re-creation with proper sources and references. In its current form, this is an article that should have gone through WP:BLAR easily. MarioGom (talk) 13:45, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

:*Keep Notable.

:80.212.144.89 (talk) 14:39, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Can we get some more inputs on the newly added sources and the ATD proposed?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 01:33, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:06, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 10:21, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

::*Comment It has been relisted twice, deletion guide says not to. I am curious to why it wasn't closed for non concensus before you relisted it /gen

::2A02:2121:2C8:CC39:14B1:21FF:FEEE:954D (talk) 18:42, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

:::Up to three relists is standard practice, not sure where you see otherwise. Eddie891 Talk Work 11:36, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

::::Technically, WP:RELIST recommends against third relists, though realistically, as you mention, third relists have been common practice for quite a while now and (since P&G normally reflects common practice), that part of DELPRO should probably be updated. Alpha3031 (tc) 15:55, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Merge with Symbian#Design: I do think an article could be developed here, but as is is not substantive to preclude a merge. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:25, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Merge. I don't think there are enough sources addressing the format directly and in-detail (instead of tangentially, when discussing aspects of Symbian more generally) for a standalone article to be viable. Anything verifiable and appropriate to include in the main article can be merged, though, for example, what the acronym stands for might not be that, since I can see some sources expand it as "Symbian Installation System" or "Symbian Installation Source". Alpha3031 (tc) 06:12, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.