Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SP77 31-18

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 14:58, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

=[[:SP77 31-18]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=SP77 31-18}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=SP77 31-18}})

As for the reasons of proposing this article for deletion: it does not meet WP:NASTRO at all and likely is difficult to improve properly due to it only being mentioned in large scale-surveys with basic properties and not showing its significance. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 14:58, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Delete, absolutely nothing notable about this object, fails WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. No studies dedicated to this object individually or as a member of a small sample. The article is created purely on the basis of a large radius, calculated from one large-scale database which has a particularly high luminosity and low temperature. Other databases suggest a more typical star, possibly not even a true supergiant. Lithopsian (talk) 13:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Delete - running a search, I came across this [http://simbad.cds.unistra.fr/simbad/sim-id?bibyear1=1850&bibyear2=%24currentYear&submit=Display&Ident=%403137056&Name=SP77++31-18&bibdisplay=refsum&bibyear1=1850&bibyear2=%24currentYear#lab_bib Simbad data]. I assume that does not count. I didn't find anything else using non-astronomical resources online so it doesn't meet WP:GNG. --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 03:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Delete: there are no studies or other sources with any WP:SIGCOV of the star; the only sources are SIMBAD and databases. Neither of those sources establish any notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NASTRO. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 08:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.