Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salma Phillips
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Salma Phillips}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salma Phillips}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Salma Phillips}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 00:28, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
=[[:Salma Phillips]]=
:{{la|1=Salma Phillips}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Salma Phillips}})
Doesn't meet notability. Refs don't meet RS. Cosmo ref looked promising until it turned out to be DL. Nswix (talk) 00:17, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Nigeria. Nswix (talk) 00:17, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- DeletePer nominator.DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 01:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 04:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.