Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samson For President

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 12:31, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

=[[Samson For President]]=

:{{la|Samson For President}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Samson_For_President Stats])

:({{Find sources|Samson For President}})

Nothing indicates that he meets WP:MUSBIO. Article relies on his own website, believe he fails GNG Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete as failing the guidelines mentioned by nominator, unless improved with better references and indication of notability. 331dot (talk) 09:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 13:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep. I was able to find a lot of media coverage, particularly for Papa’s Old Piano and under his real name, Martin Wahlgren Bejarano, including 3 articles all about either it or him plus the Nyhetsmorgon interview that was already alluded to, and have filled out the article a bit while cutting down the peacock descriptions. There is mention on his website of at least one further newspaper article, in Dagens Nyheter, that is not online, but I believe he now demonstrably meets GNG. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:25, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 16:44, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (gas) @ 16:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep - Per Yngvadottirs found coverage.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:24, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.