Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sangria (color)

=[[Sangria (color)]]=

:{{la|Sangria (color)}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Sangria (color)}})

This is just a dictionary definition of a non-notable shade of red. bobrayner (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete – unsourced; the source Keraunos mentions above is for sanguine, and that's not much. Dicklyon (talk) 06:12, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete No evidence of notability. (The word has not existed since 1382, but even if it had, that would not make it notable. There are thousands of English words recorded much earlier than that, but we don't have articles on all of them: Wikipedia is not a dictionary.) JamesBWatson (talk) 12:56, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. frankie (talk) 17:15, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete this and all the other nominated colors. Manufacturers commonly invent names for the colors of their paints or dyes or crayons, and that is all they are: a manufacturer's invented name. That does not make them notable. --MelanieN (talk) 17:18, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete. Just an article that describes one of the countless not-notable colors. There are countless plausible names for any particular color- this one is just an example of them. It's just not notable. I can't imagine this article being expanded from a one-line dictionary definition into a full article.--Slon02 (talk) 17:23, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.