Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Keith

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Hermione1980 22:20, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

=[[Scott Keith]]=

Don't think this is a speedy, though a Google search only brings up a livejournal which isn't really notable. Haven't looked further into Google results though. Francs[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Francs2000&action=edit§ion=new 2000] Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg 10:47, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep Looks legit to me. Marcus22 11:58, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Just a livejournal? He's written three books, which (together with his columns) seem to have gotten quite a bit of attention in the wrestling world. I had never heard of him, but I think he's notable enough. --JoanneB 12:24, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep He has written several books and is well-known by pro wrestling insiders. ErikNY 12:54, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Oh lord, my secret affinity for wrestling rises again. Keith is a well-known, somewhat controversial pundit. Xoloz 07:44, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete' So now it's down to people from a blog saying it's okay whether they admit it or not? This site has went downhill.

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.