Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secrets of a digital marketing ninja

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (by User:Anthony Bradbury) SmartSE (talk) 12:51, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Secrets of a digital marketing ninja]]=

:{{la|Secrets of a digital marketing ninja}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Secrets_of_a_digital_marketing_ninja Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Secrets of a digital marketing ninja}})

No indication that this is notable by our standards. The title gets [https://www.google.it/search?q=%22Secrets+of+a+digital+marketing+ninja%22&num=50&hl=en&dcr=0&source=lnms&tbm=nws no hits] on GNews. It is [http://www.worldcat.org/search?q=%22Secrets+of+a+digital+marketing+ninja%22&qt=results_page not listed in WorldCat]. The sources in the page are an illiterate puff-piece by a "freelance blogger" and a review that appears to have been written by the author. Page created by a paid editor, so promotional in intent if not in tone. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete Regardless of tone, this is unambiguous advertising. SmartSE (talk) 10:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as above. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete per nom as above. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 10:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.