Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Rodwell

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

=[[Sheila Rodwell]]=

:{{la|Sheila Rodwell}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd=Wikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2F{{urlencode:Sheila Rodwell}} AfD statistics])

:({{findsources|Sheila Rodwell}})

Delete per WP:PROF. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:31, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Keep per WP:PROF, important female scientist. Professor at Cambridge University, awarded OBE. Obituaries in The Daily Telegraph and The Times Higher Education Supplement, etc Bobble hobble dobble (talk) 22:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Nsk92 (talk) 03:12, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Keep. According to [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=author%3A%22Sheila+Bingham%22 Google scholar] she has nine papers with over 200 citations each, and an h-index in the low 50s. This is well over the usual standards for meeting WP:PROF #1. The major newspaper obituaries also give her a pass of WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:52, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Passes both WP:PROF and WP:BIO. In addition to the obits listed in the article, here is another one[http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122686103/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0] from the journal Nutrition Bulletin. Nsk92 (talk) 04:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Clear Keep but should the page be removed to "Sheila Bingham" as this seems to have been her most used professional name? Xxanthippe (talk) 06:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC).
Keep, as Sheila Bingham, wildly successful. Abductive (reasoning) 06:13, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.