Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shenita Moore

:{{la|Shenita Moore}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Shenita Moore}})

Prod removed with no improvement; prod rationale: fails WP:ENTERTAINER, no evidence of multiple notable roles; recurring role on Greys Anatomy was as 'Surgical Nurse / Another Nurse / ER Nurse' Tassedethe (talk) 20:52, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Shortness of career and lack of coverage make this article premature. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:13, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

• KEEP per MightyMoore. Shenita Moore has been a professional voice over and on camera actress for over 10 years, all of which have been SPEAKING ROLES, not BACKGROUND WORK. There was a problem with using the word RECURRING (which the role is, fyi), so it was changed to APPEARANCES. She is clearly visible as being an up and coming actress and deserves a small corner of Wikipedia. User: MightyMoore
• Delete: What criteria of WP:ENTERTAINER does MightyMoore claim the subject fulfills? None that I can see. Being (allegedly) "up and coming," having speaking roles on screen and being a professional actor forms no part of Wikipedia notability criteria. Certainly if the article touts three roles as her key appearances where the subject, respectively, is (a) credited as "ER Nurse" (b) credited as "Blood Bank Nurse" with a single appearance and (c) credited with a single appearance, she's far, far below the threshold. User:MightyMoore appears to be a SPA; the only previous appearance was disputing with an admin, back in January, the apparent deletion as a PROD of a previous version of this article. Salting might be appropriate.  Ravenswing  22:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

:*SPA, in fear of being pounced upon by seasoned Wikipedia Editors. Lol. Not worth the time and effort of researching and editing other pages if it will just be deleted anyway. User: MightyMoore

• Comment: The way for articles to not be nominated for deletion in the first place is for them to conform to applicable policies and guidelines, such as WP:BIO, WP:GNG and WP:RS. Along with WP:PILLAR, I strongly recommend you read those guidelines.  Ravenswing  17:33, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.