Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherri's Conundrum

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Sherri's Conundrum]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherri's Conundrum}}

:{{la|Sherri's Conundrum}} ([{{fullurl:Sherri's Conundrum|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherri's Conundrum}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Nonsense neologism. Single author removed prod without improving article. I can't think of a category of speedy for this except perhaps Hoax Porturology (talk) 03:55, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy delete as hoax. Quantpole (talk) 10:05, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Speedy Delete per G3. This is the second such page I'm coming across in two weeks. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 17:37, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete It doesn't fit into any speedy category - non-vandalistic hoaxes are explicitly excluded, and anyway I wouldn't call it a "hoax" as it's not trying to deceive. Nevertheless it is complete unencyclopaedic junk. Thryduulf (talk) 23:06, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.