Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Omega Phi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Sigma Omega Phi]]=

:{{la|Sigma Omega Phi}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Omega Phi}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Sigma Omega Phi}})

fails WP:ORG. Despite what the speedy-declining admin seems to think, statements of vague notability backed up by primary sources are not evidence of importance. Ironholds (talk) 06:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

It did not really look notable to me thanks to the lack of independent references, but it was not so free of importance claims to be worth speedy deleting. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 17:53, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete Organization of local significance in a few colleges only. DGG ( talk ) 21:53, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.