Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sin Ropa

{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log|{{collapse top|bg=#F3F9FF|1=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sin Ropa|padding=1px}}|}}

=[[Sin Ropa]]=

:{{la|Sin Ropa}} ([{{fullurl:Sin Ropa|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sin Ropa}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

After two unsuccessful speedy deletion attempts, I'm putting this up for AFD because this "song" is of highly dubious existence. Google search yields no reliable, relevant results. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 15:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

:VERY weak delete - There might be some references in a different language, the deletion should not take place if those can be found. Irbisgreif (talk) 16:01, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Also I'd like to nominate these articles for the same reason:

  • {{la|Sexy Dance}}
  • {{la|Mírame A Los Ojos}}
  • {{la|Provocative (Niurka Marcos song)}}
  • {{la|Un Break}}
  • {{la|Provocating}}
  • {{la|La Emperadora Re-Evaluada}}
  • {{la|Ámame Toda La Noche}}
  • {{la|La Emperadora}}

These are all unverifiable Andrewlp1991 (talk) 16:05, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

:VERY weak delete on these as well. Irbisgreif (talk) 16:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Strong delete - Most AfD discussions that I've been involved in are debating whether the article subject is notable enough to merit inclusion based on the coverage in reliable sources. In this case, we can't even verify with confidence that these songs even exist! -- Atamachat 20:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Not verifiable, not notable. Triplestop x3 18:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log|{{collapse bottom}}|}}