Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Shah Sulaiman Hall

:{{la|Sir Shah Sulaiman Hall}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sir_Shah_Sulaiman_Hall Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sir Shah Sulaiman Hall}})

A non-notable hostel within Aligarh Muslim University. Can't find anything other than passing mentions, similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indira Gandhi Hall. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:20, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete Fails the notability guideline. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 22:41, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

• Keep. It is a historical building built in the colonial era. Arifjwadder (talk) 22:13, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

:*Note {{Ping|Arifjwadder}} Claiming it's an historical building is by itself not a valid argument, please see WP:OLDAGE. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 10:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:GEOFEAT. A building is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the bodies which have a vested interest in them. Here the significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources required to establish notability is not present. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 10:52, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
• Delete although this could be mentioned briefly at the university's article. SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

• Comment. {{Ping|Sam Sailor}} {{Ping|SwisterTwister}} {{Ping|Rsrikanth05}} have found some sources as of now and cited. Please have a look and help in improve it. Thanks.- Arifjwadder (talk) 08:46, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

::How many of those are published by AMU and other non-independent publishers? And how many of those left out discuss the building in depth? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:41, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

• redirect/merge to the main university article, nothing substantial about the building as a building. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:20, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

• Delete for lack of significant coverage. It fails the building guidelines at WP:GEOFEAT. No need for a redirect, it is mentioned in the Shah Sulaiman article, which one should get to before typing in "Hall". --Bejnar (talk) 03:01, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.