Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snowden Capital Advisors

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

=[[Snowden Capital Advisors]]=

:{{la|Snowden Capital Advisors}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Snowden_Capital_Advisors Stats])

:({{Find sources|Snowden Capital Advisors}})

fails WP:CORP. created by a single purpose editor. nothing in gnews despite its grand claims. [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=au&tbm=nws&q=%22Snowden+Capital+Advisors%22&oq=%22Snowden+Capital+Advisors%22&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i53.2295.2889.0.3248.3.2.0.1.0.0.234.234.2-1.1.0...0.0...1ac.1.c2yyMvM5V_E#q=%22Snowden+Capital+Advisors%22&hl=en&gl=au&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=ucuZUZLsOcjqiAfy74D4AQ&ved=0CCEQpwUoBQ&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.46751780,d.aGc&fp=715e841b0325d032&biw=1280&bih=843]. LibStar (talk) 07:09, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:03, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Delete - agree, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. The "sources" are simply WP:ROUTINE business announcements - "subject hires x" - some of which seem like an attempt at inheriting notability from particular executives or their former employer. Other sources are company press releases or the company's own website. One or two of the sources that (based on the title alone) might have some WP:N value are behind paywalls. More than happy to consider those if someone can let us know what they actually say, but if they are anything like the others, I don't hold out much hope. Stalwart111 01:38, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete As things stand I am seeing nothing beyond April 2012 announcements of the company being established and its aspirations, plus later recruitment announcements. These do not seem sufficient for :WP:CORPDEPTH verification of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:13, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Delete as it fails WP:CORP and per Stalwart111 - the sources look like routine announcements. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 14:12, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.