Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorita d'Este

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus to delete following relisting. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Sorita d'Este]]=

:{{la|Sorita d'Este}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sorita_d%27Este Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Sorita d'Este}})

Does not meet notability criteria. All books are self-published (via her Avalonia organisation). Also a lack of reliable sources, and I can't find any myself. Santa Cruz Santa (talk) 23:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 October 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Delete the article lacks reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:18, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete there is fundamental problems with the sources used besides being mostly unreliable they are dead links too. — Ammarpad (talk) 18:46, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete I used archive bot on the page, but the rescued links don't help. Galobtter (talk) 10:34, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.