Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spoken Reasons

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 01:44, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

=[[Spoken Reasons]]=

:{{la|Spoken Reasons}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Spoken_Reasons Stats])

:({{Find sources|Spoken Reasons}})

Autobio by non-notable comedian. Orange Mike | Talk 03:17, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep - I have actually only seen him in the Movie, The Heat but he did impress me very much and though his "filmography" is well limited, I think he does fulfil the inclusion criteria, he is very famous (much more famous after the movie), had this article been nominated a year ago, I would have voted for deletion but I think we need to wait this out for another year, his page views say [http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Spoken_Reasons 18000 views] in the last 3 months...a bit of copyediting (since it has been mainly written by him) and we are good to go...--Stemoc (talk) 03:13, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep—Sufficient coverage in reliable sources (there's enough citations in the article itself) shows that he passes the GNG. LivitEh?/What? 16:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:09, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


  • Keep Sufficiently notable - coverage in reliable sources Deathlibrarian (talk) 06:43, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep, good amount of secondary source coverage out there, — Cirt (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.