Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Pepoon

:{{la|Steve Pepoon}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Pepoon}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Steve Pepoon}})

fails WP:BIO, not notable Alan - talk 21:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable. --MelanieN (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

• Keep - [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=Steve+Pepoon&cf=all] -Peregrine Fisher (talk) 21:43, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep per Peregrine Fisher. The number of easily found articles about this person show meeting WP:GNG. The nominator may have missed them. Also, the simplest or research finds that the individual won an Emmy Award in 1991, and is thus notable per WP:ANYBIO's "The person has received a notable award or honor". Was easy to find and easier to source. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
• Comment: Be sure to use quotes when doing Google searches. Woogee (talk) 00:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep as per Peregrine Fisher and because of the Emmy award. I question the amount of WP:BEFORE work done here. DES ^(talk) 00:52, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep - per above Gran² 19:38, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.