Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Still from the Block

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:11, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Still from the Block]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Still from the Block}}

:{{la|Still from the Block}} ([{{fullurl:Still from the Block|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Still from the Block (Jennifer Lopez album)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Completing this dangling AFD nomination, because it certainly looks like it should be deleted. Only sources are forums on a Jennifer Lopez fansite. —Kww(talk) 19:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete for now:i would say delete, but i found some sources that my be reliable enough to keep it ...[http://www.play.com/Music/CD/4-/8229093/Greatest-Hits/Product.html] [http://www.cdjapan.co.jp/detailview.html?KEY=EICP-1105] [http://www.cdjapan.co.jp/detailview.html?KEY=EICP-1103] [http://www.mariahdaily.com/temp/magweeklies/2008-10-06/intouch.jpg].....i dont know, are those reliable sources??

Anywhere But Home (talk) 09:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

:Comment:None of them confirm the title, so it doesn't matter whether they are reliable. As a rule, we try to avoid sourcing things to merchant sites, but they can be used if necessary. Magazine scans on fansites are a bad idea ... always better to get a physical copy of the magazine and use that as a source.—Kww(talk) 13:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.