Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. P. Sasikumar

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:09, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

=[[T. P. Sasikumar]]=

:{{la|T. P. Sasikumar}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|T. P. Sasikumar}})

I see no evidence that the person satisfies WP:PROF, WP:BIO or WP:GNG. PROD removed by IP without explanation. Muhandes (talk) 18:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete Promotional article without independent sources, and with no evidence of notability. Essentially a repost of Dr T P Sasikumar, which was created by the same author, and twice speedily deleted as promotional. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:02, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete No notability "elements" in the article. Single digits citations on google scholar. A google search returned nothing of substance, but google news returned this one story in The Hindu: [http://www.hindu.com/lf/2005/04/10/stories/2005041000230200.htm "A senior scientist dealing with the nuances of space technology, Mr. Sasikumar is on a journey to unravel the mysteries of yagas performed at various places. R. Ramabhadran Pillai meets him..."] but I don't think it's enough... Tradedia (talk) 17:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:N,WP:PROF and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete - Appears to be a self-promotional article for an individual who fails WP:PROF, WP:BIO, WP:GNG and WP:N. SaveATreeEatAVegan —Preceding undated comment added 04:47, 15 February 2012 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.