Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TBS Publishers' Distributors
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
=[[TBS Publishers' Distributors]]=
:{{la|TBS Publishers' Distributors}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|TBS Publishers' Distributors}})
Does not have notability or pass WP:GNG or WP:NCOMPANY. There is not significant coverage over numerous WP:RS. The article has many primary sources from the company website. These called awards or certifications? For instance on of the "awards", if you read thru to the sources you will find 100 bookseller companies rec'd the same thing. see here:[http://www.instituteofbookpublishing.com/p/Publishing-Today-March-2008#fipawards] Sounds like some of the books sold there might have some notability, but notability does not go to the book store for having sold a possibly notable book. II say Delete as nominator. Zpeopleheart (talk) 10:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Many references are notable. If we go through the sources we can see that most of them are significant ones. Also note that Poorna Publications is the publication wing of TBS. They published the said notable books. If their work is notable, why don't they? Regarding award, its a prestigious award from a national body. Do anyone loss significance by the award is won by many companies?--Sidharthan (talk) 13:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG Josu4u (talk) 22:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 04:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't see any in-depth coverage that would help this pass WP:NCORP. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:18, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 10:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.