Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Target (2018 film)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Target (2018 film)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Target_(2018_film) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Target (2018 film)}})

Copying my PROD concern:—

{{talk quote|Unremarkable 2018 short film; the article is a stub and cites only one source, that too on Rediff.com's seemingly user-moderated site.}}

Doesn't seem to qualify either WP:GNG or WP:NFILMS.

P.S. — A draft of the same name exists at Draft:Target (2018 film). Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 11:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

• Delete does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NFILM at this time Atlantic306 (talk) 16:41, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
• Delete lacks sufficient coverage in sources apart from IMDB and Linkedin. —Mythdon 03:32, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
• Delete Sources provided only indicate that the film exists, not that it is notable. As stated in the nomination, the referenced websites could be considered unreliable if they are user-moderated.– numbermaniac 14:14, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
• Delete. Short films even by notable directors can be difficult to source, and by non-notable directors they are often impossible to source to NFILM and/or GNG. This case is no exception. Sam Sailor 17:20, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.