Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thai Premier League 2009 Fixtures & Results

:{{la|Thai Premier League 2009 Fixtures & Results}} ([{{fullurl:Thai Premier League 2009 Fixtures & Results|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thai Premier League 2009 Fixtures & Results}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

The articles contain an indiscriminate collection of information, thus violating WP:NOT#IINFO. The single matches listed in this article have limited (if any) notability, thus violating WP:NOT#STATS and WP:N. The articles do not cite any sources, thus failing WP:V. Finally, the results are sufficiently displayed through an results table within the respective main articles. Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 11:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because of similar issues:

:{{la|Thai Division 1 League 2009 Fixtures & Results}}

:{{la|Thai Division 2 League North Eastern Region 2009 Fixtures & Results}}

:{{la|Thai Division 2 League Northern Region 2009 Fixtures & Results}}

:{{la|Thai Division 2 League Central & Eastern Region 2009 Fixtures & Results}}

:{{la|Thai Division 2 League Bangkok & field Region 2009 fixtures and results}}

:{{la|Thai Division 2 League Southern Region 2009 Fixtures & Results}}

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 12:07, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

• Strongest possible delete, this is utter trivia. The main season article (eg Thai Division 1 League 2009) is sufficient. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 12:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• Comment I agree that this violates the policies that Wikipedia is not a webhost and it is not the news. On the other hand, I look at 2009 Atlanta Braves season #Game log and I see the exact same abuse-- someone's personal scorecard to follow each game as it happens. Mandsford (talk) 13:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete all. Firstly, the results table in Thai Division 1 League 2009 would be sufficient when completed. I also feel we should merge all Div 2 pages (the separate season article for each region) into a single season article for the whole of Division 2 - there's no need for each regional division to have its own separate article. Bettia (bring on the trumpets!) 14:08, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

• Strongly Keep Other pages have results built into them and keep the general pages cluttered, spreading it out the way i have done makes it less cluttered and easier to read. An exampole i will give is this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-League_2008%E2%80%9309#Home_and_away_season. All cluttered on one page.

One of reason i would keep is why have some pages linked to clubs for seasons such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hull_City_A.F.C._season_2008%E2%80%9309, and the rest of the clubs. Whats the difference? We have many pages for individual clubs and 5 0r 6 pages for a whole country.

On the point about merging pages, well thats just a joke, as that comment is by someone who clearly doesn't know the makeup of Thai football. Each league is an entity of its own.Druryfire (talk) 16:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and Jmorrison230582. GiantSnowman 18:42, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom, just unnecessary Spiderone (talk) 15:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

• I know people want to delete this page, but what is the difference between this and say this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FA_Cup_2008%E2%80%9309, this also has results doesn't it? Or is that page worthy because its more famous?Druryfire (talk) 18:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• Also one active user on the page User talk:Goy spur hasn't been told about this potential delete, if you want a fair argument then surely you should contact the user?Druryfire (talk) 18:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Jmorrison230582 - league season articles are way enough. --Angelo (talk) 07:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.