Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The summary "Of Mice and Men"

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. clear copyvio, but an article or extended section on the plot of this famous novel at some reasonable degree of detail might be appropriate--not this much detail, but a little more than in the main article DGG (talk) 07:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[The summary "Of Mice and Men"]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The summary "Of Mice and Men"}}

:{{la|The summary "Of Mice and Men"}} ([{{fullurl:The summary "Of Mice and Men"|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The summary "Of Mice and Men"}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Do we really need a separate article for a summary of of mice and men? I think we should just merge (if even that) and delete this. —LedgendGamer 06:12, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Comment I checked, the article is actually a copyvio of [http://www.bookrags.com/notes/omam/PART1.htm this]. How do I withdraw an AfD and instead place a speedy G12 tag on the article? —LedgendGamer 06:16, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete--you got the speedy up there, and I think that's all you can do. Of course, you could delete the entire content, and I was tempted to do so, but that would leave the AfD for the possible content of the article. Well, such possible content should be deleted: "Summary" is not an encyclopedic topic, and the author should consider English grammar as well. ("Summary" here is to be followed by the preposition "of.") I'm sure some goodwilling admin will come along and delete the whole thing--thanks for pointing out the article and following up on it. Drmies (talk) 06:47, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.