Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Wellington

This has the hallmarks of a hoax, but someone may know better. Deb 17:39, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Speedy delete. It's a hoax based on the reptilian humanoid concept. This has been processed at least once in VfD already (old discussion is above), so can be speedied. jni 17:49, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• I've speedy deleted it. It was already deleted once before (see below). Nothing to see here, move along, move along. - UtherSRG 18:01, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Delete: nonsense. —Morven 07:01, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: poor attempt of polluting Wikipedia with nonsense. jni 08:16, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Tedious rubbish, patently false. Average Earthman 09:02, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Patent nonsense--MaxMad 10:57, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Another argument in favour of expanding the speedy delete criteria. Delete. —Rory ☺ 13:31, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
• :This falls under patent nonsense, so there is no need to expand criteria. CSD —siroχo 22:58, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Patent nonsense. Probably somebody who read reptilian humanoids and decided to play along. — Gwalla | Talk 19:41, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Heretics!!!: How dare you defame this noted scholar who added to Wikapedia a much needed biography for one of America's greatest men. You are all trounced!
• Comment: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Thomas_Wellington&diff=6364285&oldid=6364271 This] by [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Special:Contributions&target=137.18.255.41 IP 137.18.255.41]. More below. Andrewa 02:32, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Keep: All information in this article is backed up by Ancient Chinese manuscripts and vintage Corn Flakes boxes. User:Claw 17:01, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep: Thomas Wellington drives an ice cream truck covered in human skulls. User:Jin Shin 17:11, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep: He also drives a Dodge Stratus. User:W. Mouse 17:18, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep: Wellington is the unwed father of Bill Brasky. User:Christopher Walken 17:11, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
• These are joke votes, aren't they? -- Mike Rosoft 22:01, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Yes. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Thomas_Wellington&diff=6364610&oldid=6364456], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Thomas_Wellington&diff=6364610&oldid=6364456], plus more below. Andrewa 02:32, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Speedy delete! Damn, I knew this was nonsense when I found it. The sockpuppets don't help. Give it up. - Lucky 6.9 21:30, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Go! - Mr. Body Massage Machine 21:33, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Thomas_Wellington&diff=6364920&oldid=6364783

Another by IP 137.18.255.41]. Andrewa 02:32, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• Keep: Raptors are not to be trifled with. Mortimer 21:33, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Thomas_Wellington&diff=6365353&oldid=6364920 and again]. Andrewa 02:32, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Patent nonsense. ("The Wellington dynasty traces its roots back nearly 6010 years ago to a Flavius Well-Ton, a famous hunter of wild cats in Europe." What the ...?) Delete and stop vandalizing Wikipedia and disrupting voting process. May even be put to BJAODN, if somebody considers it funny. -- Mike Rosoft 22:01, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Silly. - RedWordSmith 22:42, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Very mildly amusing nonsense. Bill 22:44, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Joke by anon. Not up to BJAODN IMO. Andrewa 02:35, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, for obvious reasons. -R. fiend 03:52, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Unsinnlich!. --Improv 16:17, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete this and the redirect Wellington, Thomas. —tregoweth 17:43, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)