Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy O'Hagan

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Timothy O'Hagan}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Timothy O'Hagan}})

Does this pass WP:PROF? The citations for his books and papers seem limited so me, to the point where I am unconvinced of notability. Uhooep (talk) 16:54, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 17:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
• Keep. The article as nominated already had enough in-depth sources about his books (four about one and three about the other) for WP:AUTHOR. Citation counts are often not meaningful for academics in book-publishing fields. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:15, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Philosophy, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:42, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
• Keep - Per David Eppstein -- reviews are the most important for book-publishing fields and there are more than enough here. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 21:46, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
• Keep Significant reviews of his books in academic publications. Lamona (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
• Keep, given that reviews of his books means he passes WP:NAUTHOR. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:12, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.