Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toilet talk
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Toilet talk}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toilet talk}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Toilet talk}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz Read! Talk! 06:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
=[[:Toilet talk]]=
:{{la|1=Toilet talk}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Toilet talk}})
No indication that this is the main usage of the term "toilet talk" (may also refer to people talking to one another while on the toilet, for example). Seems to violate WP:NEO. QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:10, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, textbook WP:NEO. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.