Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Troscianko

:{{la|Tom Troscianko}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tom_Troscianko Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Tom Troscianko}})

Fails WP:GNG and entire article is written as an Obituary. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:50, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

• Keep. Stunning citations on GS. Did the nominator carry out WP:Before? Xxanthippe (talk) 03:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC).
• {{ping|Xxanthippe}} I did... Did you read the article? Full of promotional WP:EL and culminating in a link to "celebrate Toms' Life".... The very definition of WP:NOTOBITUARY...--Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 07:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
• I daresay he did. At first I was taken aback by the article tone but its mostly not that bad. It wouldn't take much to remove the celebratory stuff. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:15, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
• Keep. Cursory glance through Google shows the man to be notable. AFD is not cleanup. Agathoclea (talk) 10:17, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.