Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Swanhaus (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 17:21, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

=[[Tommy Swanhaus]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Swanhaus}}

:{{la|Tommy Swanhaus}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Tommy Swanhaus}})

This article was deleted in May 2008 for lack of notability. This version has existed since 2009 and I can't see anything that has been added that suggests he meets notability guidelines. There is mention of a "min" award, but it's really not clear whether or not that is what we would consider a significant award. It's also not clear from the [http://www.minonline.com/awards/ima/2009event-winners.html reference] whether or not Swanhaus was awarded this himself, as neither he nor Swanhaus Media, nor Interns are explicitly mentioned on that page. I can't find any significant coverage of him in reliable sources, just a few trivial mentions, and significant coverage in social network/promotional sites. Beloved Freak 12:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 12:53, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Delete. As with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connecticut Film Organization, four of the five sources provided don't mention the subject, and the other one is a broken link. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Delete per [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Tommy+Swanhaus%22 paucity of sources]. The individual fails WP:GNG, and his being CEO of a set of companies that cannot themselves be determined as notable does nothing either. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.