Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.S. attack on Fallujah

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus. – malathion ^talk 06:43, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

I don't know what discussion malathion is reading but there seems to me to be a clear concensus to delete this page. If anyone is really interested in mergeing its contents with Operation Phantom Fury, they should do it. None of those who voted for mergeing meant to indicate that this page should be saved, they meant for the tiny scraps of it that are creditable to be merged. - atfyfe

=[[U.S. attack on Fallujah]]=

Bias propaganda selectively citing reports of abuse by U.S. Marines. This information is covered in the page on Fallujah and so (1) does not need it's own entry, and (2) even if it did this shouldn't be it. As a person who spent a long time in Fallujah (not during the attack in question) I am willing to admit not all the acts by US soldiers in Iraq may be morally acceptable. However, I would argue most are and that this entry well over-exaggerates the bad behavior of US soldiers in Iraq. It was also my experience in Iraq that a large amount of the reports given to the media by Iraqis were themselves lies or exaggerations. Heck, I've even been to the hospital cited in this article.

There is a valid place for criticism of U.S. actions in Iraq, but this entry is just rampant nonsense. [Delete]

Delete Way too much bias 80.42.28.76 23:31, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete, WP:POV, basic facts already covered [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Iraqi_insurgency in] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falluja several] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Vigilant_Resolve different] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Phantom_Fury articles], generally worthless and non-encyclopedic. Xaa 00:54, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
Keep for merge to Operation Phantom Fury. Offset them with other quotes if you think it helps. Gazpacho 04:40, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
Redirect to Operation Phantom Fury, merge whatever is usable. Dpbsmith (talk) 14:14, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
Redirect/Merge per above. — RJH 21:40, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Content is obvious propaganda from unreliable sources. ObsidianOrder 10:43, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Redirect/Merge to Operation Phantom Fury, merge whatever is usable. --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 01:56, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Undocumented Propaganda, covered elsewhere. Preczewski 18:58, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

Merge Brownman40 07:21, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
Merge what can be merged. I doubt there's much here worth salvaging, though. The quotations look questionable, and the intro certainly isn't of any use. Still, it might be good for Operation Phantom Fury to have a line mentioning the controversy somewhere. Aquillion 07:20, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete WP:NOT a soapbox Klonimus 20:01, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.