Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Toronto 93 Highland Ave.

Decidedly non-notable building from a user who has an article he wrote on himself also on AfD. Also of note, the picture in the article is not the building described, illustrating further unverifiability and/or hoaxeshness and/or vanity fluffing. I know this because, 1) I took that picture a couple of days ago, and 2) I've never been to Toronto. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 05:21, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - not sure how to vote but it may be a notable botanical garden... interesting case. gren グレン 05:46, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - The "botanical garden" part is just a weak and unsourced claim that certain wild flowers had been introduced there by the author of the article. There is nothing notable here, not even unsourced claims for notability. TH 09:45, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. No attempt to assert notability. — Saxifrage ✎ 10:05, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per the excellent explanation by the nominator. -- Kicking222 14:15, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nom has it covered Deizio 18:08, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Editing corrections I was putting in List of botanical gardens in Canada and had this originally listed in the booklet I wrote in 1991. I did not link it in the right place and put it in the Botanical Gardens section in Wiki. It should have been and will soon be linked on the University of Toronto Wiki pages where it should have gone in the first place. Links for the graphics were uplaoded in Wikimedia and now that I look, and I totally agree, when I made the jpeg link on Wikipedia, the photos were different and not mine. Perhaps someone can instruct me on linking from WikiMedia to Wikipedia??? If you go to my page on Media you will see the actual 93 Highland photos. Thanks for pointing this out to me an I do apologize. WayneRay 00:48, 24 April 2006 (UTC)WayneRay

• Delete per nom. Copy of [http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/200/300/hms/hort.htm this], so unless the author is relinguishing his rights by releasing under the GFDL, it can't go here anyways. --Calton | Talk 01:04, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: It's not just another house, but it's not particularly notable either. Peter Grey 07:14, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

'OK well delete or keep, either way it's not my house and it's not your house, but it is still the 32 room mansion (house) set aside and used by each President of the University of Toronto (Ontario) in the posh Rosedale section of downtown and has a 3 acre garden, ponds and rock garden with great botanical specimens. And it was taken from the above link, because I wrote the above link. Make a deciision and keep or delete, I will be back from vacation in New Brunswick in a week after my book launch and will either see it there or gone, your choice I leavee it up to you. WayneRay 18:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)WayneRay

• Delete per nom. Ardenn 04:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It's weak, but I like buildings. Deet 02:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.