Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Up & Go

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company. Redirected to Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company. Anything worth merging can be recovered from the article history. Randykitty (talk) 12:26, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

=[[Up & Go]]=

:{{la|Up & Go}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Up_%26_Go Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Up & Go}})

Does not seem to meet WP:Not, 2 of the references are first party and the only third party source is built around the press release. This article read much like a press release/advert. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:58, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:27, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 18:27, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Selective merge to Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company. From what I have found, overall coverage in multiple reliable sources is not quite enough. Source examples include [http://www.foodmag.com.au/news/up-go-claims-are-healthy-sanitarium-hits-back-at-c], [http://ausfoodnews.com.au/2013/06/26/sanitarium-hits-back-at-choice-claims-that-liquid-breakfasts-have-%E2%80%9Cshonky%E2%80%9D-health-claims.html], [http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/food/choice-breakfast-drinks-like-up-go-making-shonky-claims-to-consumers/story-fneuz92c-1226669116972]. The coverage is not significant enough to qualify the topic for a standalone article. NorthAmerica1000 20:01, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Merge as per Northamerica NealeFamily (talk) 00:00, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete I do not believe a merge would suffice. This products only claim to notability was it was listed by some health group as misleading and the company fired back with a press release countering the health group, as I am sure almost all breakfast to go drinks did. If anything a single sentence to cover this the corporations article, but even then it gives it too much attention.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 02:24, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 20:28, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:26, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete Article with a weak Merge The controversy over their protein content claims seems to be all they are known for. Perhaps that deserves a line in the parent company, but certainly not a standalone article. EBY (talk) 01:40, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

:*If the article is deleted, a merge won't be performable. NorthAmerica1000 18:43, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.