Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Luzon

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Urban Luzon}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Urban Luzon}})

This article has been unsourced since 2009 and violates WP:NOTDICT. Looking for sources on this (in English, to be clear, although it is an English term) only turns up news stories that happen to use the term Urban Luzon, often in relation to television, and studies that just say "urban Luzon", presumably meaning the statement literally. Despite the nice map, even if this article were to be changed to actually comment on the area rather than define the term, that would be better put in the Mega Manila article or one of the many similar terms linked in the See Also part of the page. Mrfoogles (talk) 02:53, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Geography, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

:"Urban Luzon" isn't exactly a place, just like electoral districts aren't places; it's more like a television market in the United States. Therefore, the article should be indeed about it as a television market, and not say, what landforms and tourist spots are in there. With that being said, singular television markets do not have articles, so I don't know how to proceed. Maybe a redirect to AGB Nielsen Philippines? Howard the Duck (talk) 14:49, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

::That sounds fine to me. Mrfoogles (talk) 15:43, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

• Redirect Urban Luzon → AGB Nielsen Philippines. "Urban Luzon" is just an alternative term used by AGB Nielsen Philippines to refer to the Greater Manila Area, which also refers to the same area or provinces. Additionally, this article violated the WP:NOTDICTIONARY as it only pertains to the definition of this term without demonstrating its notability. AstrooKai (Talk) 16:21, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
• Redirect: Per AstrooKai's reasoning, Urban Luzon should point to AGB Nielsen Philippines. XxTechnicianxX (talk) 12:44, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.