Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vatteluttu

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, withdrawn by nominator, no deletes. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:41, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

=[[Vatteluttu]]=

:{{la|Vatteluttu}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Vatteluttu}})

*Delete This is a recreation of the Grantha script article in a biased manner; Grantha is the widely accepted neutral name for the script - vatteluttu being a local name for it; there doesn't seem to be any difference between the two in form. The image included in the Vatteluttu page makes no mention of Vatteluttu - rather it mentions the Grantha script (also known as Pallava). HumanFrailty (talk) 06:40, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

  • Keep. I do not understand the allegation of bias here at all. David Diringer's The Alphabet: A Key to the History of Mankind treats the two scripts as closely related but separate. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:51, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep Grantha and Vattelutthu are not the same script. --Arvind (talk) 16:30, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep. Given HumanFrailty's standard nominations of anything Tamil (some of which are valid noms), I find it hard to consider anything more than a disruptive nomination. Read the numerous gbooks comparisons on the origins and relationship between the two scripts. -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 16:36, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 16:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 16:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Withdraw, this nom. HumanFrailty (talk) 18:30, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.