Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virii

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was that Wikipedia:requests for comment will take it from here. The article is now listed at RFC, and discussion of the content dispute has as a consequence begun to appear on the article's talk page. No-one either here or there has expressed a desire for an administrator to actually delete the article, and no comments have appeared here for almost 12 hours, whereas discussion has appeared on Talk:virii in that time. I'm closing this deletion discussion early, on the grounds of the nomination being a simple application of VFD by mistake, and so that there is just the one place for the content dispute discussion. Uncle G 00:55:31, 2005-08-10 (UTC)

=[[Virii]]=

I'm putting this up so official consensus can override 154.20.32.131's weird desire to have a seperate article for virii. Virii should be a redirect to plural of virus. Otherwise would be silly, as the plural of virus article clearly states the problem with "virii" and already contains the information present in virii. Apostrophe 06:26, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

  • redirect as stated by Apostrophe ManoaChild 08:41, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Please don't come to Wikipedia:votes for deletion if you don't actually want an administrator to delete an article. The place for attracting a wider audience of editors to an article content dispute ("Should this be a redirect? What should it redirect to?") is Wikipedia:requests for comment. Uncle G 11:21:48, 2005-08-09 (UTC)
  • Hah. I knew I was doing something wrong. That's what I deserve for not looking hard enough, I suppose. I do thank you for settin up the request for comments, though. Apostrophe 12:48, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.