Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivaldi's Cello

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Vivaldi's Cello}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Vivaldi's Cello}})

A WP:ROTM classical recording which fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finzi: Cello Concerto, Clarinet Concerto for fuller arguments. Narky Blert (talk) 08:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

• Keep: I found a few reliable sources which talk about the album: [https://www.gramophone.co.uk/review/vivaldis-cello], [https://books.google.com.ph/books?id=rtgmAQAAIAAJ] and [https://www.allmusic.com/album/vivaldis-cello-mw0001840717]. It's briefly talked about in these sources: [https://emliancommunications.org/2020/12/08/music-for-the-adhd-brain-cd-review/] and [https://www.tampabay.com/archive/2004/10/31/selling-yo-yo-ma-to-the-masses/]. It also had an [https://www.billboard.com/music/yo-yo-ma/chart-history/TLP/song/452058 entry on the Billboard 200]. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
• :{{ping|Superastig}} Add them to the article, and we should be good to go per WP:HEY. Narky Blert (talk) 16:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
• Keep per above comment. The Billboard 200 entry definitely satisfies WP:NALBUM. Noahfgodard (talk) 01:53, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
• Keep, article is well sourced and passes WP:NALBUM. Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
• (nom) Withdraw/keep per WP:HEY. Narky Blert (talk) 09:05, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.