Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WE ARE FURY

:{{la|WE ARE FURY}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/WE_ARE_FURY Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|WE ARE FURY}})

Musicial group lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. References are YouTube, SoundCloud, and brief mentions of EP release. Written by duo member, the article verges on an advertisement. reddogsix (talk) 02:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:38, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

• Delete. Nothing stated in the article passes WP:NMUSIC, none of the sourcing is reliable for the purposes of clearing WP:GNG (we require media coverage, not the band's own self-published social networking presence), and even a genuinely notable band wouldn't get to create the article themselves per WP:COI. We're not a free public relations directory for newish bands who are still trying to make it big — making it big comes first and then the Wikipedia article follows, not vice versa. Bearcat (talk) 18:25, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
• Delete apart from the sources are generally not reliable, there is subtle attempt to mask the notability of the subject by inordinate replication of the sources used –Ammarpad (talk) 19:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
• Delete There isnt WP:INDEPTH coverage in reliable sources to establish notability for the aforementioned musical group. Celestina007 (talk) 20:23, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.