Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE 2-21-11

:{{la|WWE 2-21-11}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|WWE 2-21-11}})

Contested PROD. Original reasoning was (and still is) Unremarkable promo that doesn't fit any CSD criteria. The PROD tag was sitting on the article for approximately 6 days. The article is not encyclopedic at all IMHO, and is one of many non-notable WWE promos.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 21:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

• Delete, unremarkable advert, only possible notability would be if the 'mystery person' turned out to be something truly spectacular, but right now that is WP:CRYSTAL and even if they were the required article wouldn't be about the promo but the event.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 23:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete - no indepedent notability whatsoever -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete Certainly not notable enough for its own article. This sort of thing can go in the wrestler's article once the identity is known and can be reliably sourced, but this is certainly not enough to build an entire article upon. GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:21, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• Delete: Why are we even discussing this? This should have been a speedy, it is completely not notable.--WillC 06:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• :Comment It doesn't fit any of the CSD criteria, and the PROD was contested, so AFD was the last option.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 06:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.