Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wai H. Tsang

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret account 18:29, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

=[[Wai H. Tsang]]=

:{{la|Wai H. Tsang}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wai_H._Tsang Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Wai H. Tsang}})

The article fails Wikipedia's notability requirements. A lack of sources makes it impossible to turn it into a real article. Article was proposed for deletion, but the prod was contested by its main editor, {{user|Skychildandsonofthesun}}. Gabbe (talk) 15:37, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete. No sources that I can find. He fails GNG and there's no special BIO guideline for pseudoscientists. --Sammy1339 (talk) 17:10, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.