Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why other peace theories are wrong

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 15:29, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

=[[Why other peace theories are wrong]]=

This page was originally located under the title Democratic peace theory (Correlation is not causation). This was done largely by User:Ultramarine. User:Pmanderson inisits that this was a POV fork of Ultramarines and has edited the original DPT page to make such a sub-article uncessary. He has then mvoed the article to this title to prove a point. Basicially, it as the bastard child of an ongoing battle between two editors who refuse to compromise with each other, and who the arbitration committee failed to deal with. Delete it and let them have their petty arguments elsewhere. Robdurbar 19:26, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

:Move to User space I believe the page contains Ultramarine's original arguments to advocate his PoV, which is that one particular class of peace theory is cpmpletely correct, and others are simply wrong. I have so tagged it. But the article Democratic peace theory does not contain those arguments, and they may be useful as raw material for other articles on the thoeries concerned. Septentrionalis 22:43, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

::I do not refuse to compromise; I would if offered one. Septentrionalis 22:48, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.