Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Scoular

:{{la|William Scoular}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/William_Scoular Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|William Scoular}})

So promotional it just needs to be WP:TNT'ed. It had no WP:INLINECITED sources, just a source at the end, which was a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE and a deadlink. I have tried adding sources, but they don't seem to add up to extensive coverage on Scoular himself, though there are mentions. This has been tagged for notability for 9 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 06:37, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

• Delete: I have added a couple of references, but the best of these (the brief 2010 item from The Globe and Mail) is effectively a local notice, and the two cited reviews only verify that the subject is going about his trade. I agree with the nominator that there is not enough to demonstrate notability, whether by :WP:DIRECTOR or :WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:34, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.