Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wright Karts

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Wright Karts]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1= Wright Karts}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title= Wright Karts}})

Delete Does not meet WP:GNG. The only reference link is their company website. The company seems to have supported many famous race drivers, but as per WP:ORGDEPTH, most of the articles speak about the racers and there is no significant coverage on the company itself.

Wikilover3509 (talk) 6:40, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England. Shellwood (talk) 10:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 11:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete – Exceedingly poor quality article. This could easily have been G11ed. I see no indication of significant coverage and no real claim of notability. 5225C (talk • contributions) 11:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • The article was created by one Jameswright2004 who had a particularly strong interest in the subject, I'm sure of a purely impersonal nature. 5225C (talk • contributions) 07:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources to prove notability. Prof.PMarini (talk) 13:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete - Poorly sourced article, and I couldn't find any third party sources reporting on it at all. BMB YT 500000 (talk) 13:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete - No sourcing and cannot find anything online that meets WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete Appears to rely on inherited notability, none of the sourcing meets the criteria to satisfy the notability of the company. HighKing++ 19:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.