Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y&R Austin

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, without opposition, after extended time for discussion. bd2412 T 22:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Y%26R_Austin]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y%26R_Austin}}

:{{la|Y%26R_Austin}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Y%26R_Austin Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Y%26R_Austin}})

There used to be a company called SicolaMartin. It was purchased by Young & Rubicam. It is now just one of the offices of that company. The website given in the Wikipedia article does not exist. This office is not a separate organization and does not merit its own page. Carax (talk) 02:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:06, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 October 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:33, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: To generate engagement

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 16:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Delete. A search for anything to suggest that WP:GNG is met leads me to conclude that this is just another branch office without any independent notability. The title is not a useful redirect to the parent company. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:00, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 21:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.