Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#Integration with Portal

{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1748854870}}

There is a proposal to change the statements of the convention for naming (and renaming) articles about Australian places. Innesw (talk) 08:09, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Proposal:

A. There should be a single place for the statement of the convention for naming articles on Australian places. Proposed new page: Wikipedia:Naming Conventions (Australian Places)

• The statements at Project Australian Places and geographic naming conventions, Australia should be replaced with 'see:' links to the new page
• The WP:NCAUST shortcut should be changed to link to the new page

B. The new page to read as follows:

[Reference numbers in [] have been added to the lines, for the purposes of the RfC discussion. They will be removed once a final text is agreed.]

{{box|wide=yes|background=white|

Below are the conventions for articles on Australian places.

== Naming of Articles ==

Australian Settled Places (towns, cities, suburbs, localities etc.)

:* [1] Articles about Australian settled places may have names in one of two forms: {{xt|"placename, state"}} or {{xt|"placename"}}

:* [2] Where the place name has or is likely to have other uses, a link from the appropriate disambiguation page should be made (eg. Darwin contains a link to Darwin, Northern Territory, and Kingston contains links to several Australian towns).

:* [3] Where {{xt|"placename, state"}} is used, a redirect from {{xt|"placename"}} should be made whenever the name by itself does not presently require disambiguation (eg: Nowra redirects to Nowra, New South Wales), and from a nickname if it's extremely common (eg. Wagga).

:* [4] Where the {{xt|"placename, state"}} format still has conflicts (such as Springfield, Victoria and Springfield, Victoria (Macedon Ranges)) add a regional term to the secondary location. Often this can be the local government area, but a more general term may be necessary when the less notable one spans multiple LGAs.

:* [5] State or territory names should not be abbreviated in article titles.

:* New Articles

:: [6] For new articles, either form of article name is acceptable, unless disambiguation or other reasons require the use of {{xt|"placename, state"}}

:* Moving / Renaming Existing Articles

:: [7] For existing articles, renaming from one name form to the other should not be done unless there is some other good reason to do it

::* [7.1] existing articles using {{xt|"placename, state"}} should not be renamed just because the state-name disambiguation is reckoned unnecessary, nor because WP:PRIMARYTOPIC allows it, nor based on an argument for 'consistency' with practice outside Australia

::* [7.2] existing articles using {{xt|"placename"}} should not be renamed based on an argument for 'consistency' with previous practice or to achieve the same form across Australian place articles. It may however become necessary for disambiguation.

:[8] Note: For a long period the convention for Australian settled places was that all articles (with only a few stated exceptions) should be named using the {{xt|"placename, state"}} form. Various statements of the convention have allowed the number of articles using the {{xt|"placename"}} form to grow in number. Both forms are now accepted.

Other Places

• [9] Local government areas should be at their official name.
• [10] Cadastral divisions should be at their name (eg: Hunter County or County of Bourke), with the state name appended if required for disambiguation
• [10.1] The form of name ('County of ...' or '... County') should be consistent within a single state.

== Infobox ==

• [11] All Australian place articles should use {{tl|Infobox Australian place}}. The infobox requires both {{para|type}} and {{para|state}} to be set. All articles should also set {{para|name|{{xt|placename}}}}.

See also: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Australian roads)

[Templates & Categories on the page]

{{Wikipedia subcat guideline|naming convention|Australian places|WP:NCAUST}}
naming, places
A

}}

• Support as Proposer:
• Part (A) ensures there is a single statement of the Australian conventions, to which editors can refer without ambiguity or finding conflicts between different texts
• Part (B) is largely derived from the two existing statements (at Project Australian Places and geographic naming conventions, Australia (= current WP:NCAUST)), in that it allows both name forms for articles. But it now also prevents unnecessary moves / renames between the two. (Moves are not banned outright, but using an argument for 'consistency', or an argument based on WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, is no longer sufficient to allow a move.)
• The number of articles with the {{xt|"placename"}} form, for Australian settled places, seems now to be about 15% of the total. The fact that form has grown so much means the number of articles using it is now too large to be reversible.
• Of the approximately 12,000 articles for towns and suburbs, that makes about 1,800 use {{xt|"placename"}}
• (For those interested, the percentage figure was derived from [https://bambots.brucemyers.com/TemplateParam.php?action=valuelinks&wiki=enwiki&template=Infobox+Australian+place¶m=type&value=town| template parameters data for Template:Infobox Australian place with type=town], then counting the number of articles on pages 1, 11, 21, 31, and 41 of the articles listing. The same was done for type=suburb. For the 500 articles listed in each case, the figure was 15.6% for type=town, and 14.0% for type=suburb. The data is as of 1 Apr 2025.)

::We now have so many articles using {{xt|"placename, state"}}, and so many using {{xt|"placename"}}, it is no longer sensible to enforce one over the other. The egg is now scrambled, we can't un-scramble it, we just need to get used to the use of either form of article name.

:* I am somewhat in two minds about [8]. On the one hand it detracts from a clean statement of Australian practice. On the other it explains why we now accept either of the two forms of article name. On balance I'd rather keep it.

:* The statement about allowing disambiguation using a city name instead of (as found at Project Australian Places) has been dropped, because the only existing case I could find was The Block (Sydney). All other examples now seem to be redirects to {{xt|"placename, state"}}.

:* Frankly, we are wasting a lot of time on move / rename requests that will not improve the ordinary reader's ability to find an article. If they don't know about the previous convention, {{xt|"placename"}} will be the article directly, a redirect to {{xt|"placename, state"}}, or a disambiguation page. And if searching in the WP search bar, the short descriptions should provide all the further detail they might need. If they do know about the previous convention, and the article is at {{xt|"placename"}}, in most cases there will be a redirect from {{xt|"placename, state"}} after a requested move. There may be a case for ensuring redirects exist in both directions, though I haven't added it to the proposed text of the convention - maybe getting those redirects in place is a task for a bot?

::Innesw (talk) 08:12, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

• support as it documents accepted practice but still prefer placename, state and geographic(state) as default Gnangarra 06:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
• Proposal to close:

::There having been no responses to this RfC in the 7 days it has been open, I propose to close it within a few more days unless a discussion actually begins. Innesw (talk) 11:41, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

::I have been thinking about this, and will leave a reply some time soon, there is a lot to address here however. Viatori (talk) 05:08, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

::I'm not sure if this was the best fora for this discussion. TarnishedPath^talk 05:24, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

::no rush to close, school holidays, long weekends theres been lots of interuptions. Give people time to think it through even though its documenting the current practice. Gnangarra 06:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

::Hi Innesw, please do not close. I am also intending on making a detailed reply, however there is much to consider here and life off wiki has been busy! Remember, there is no deadline. I would like to reply by giving this matter the attention it deserves to match the work you put into crafting it! Dfadden (talk) 12:50, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Ok, no close, and thanks for showing interest. I was perhaps a bit early with that, but the apparent lack of interest was getting to me. Re: the correct forum, I've found other more specialist forums in the Australian space (including Australian Places) have so few participants that meaningful discussions just don't happen. We could move the discussion if people wish. Innesw (talk) 21:33, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

::::No! Do not close! Servite et contribuere (talk) 22:22, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

• Comment. First of all, thank you {{u|innesw}} for pulling the proposal together. I think it is a great first step towards resolving the issues and stopping us wasting time on considering so many RMs, but I do have some reservations that prevent me from fully supporting it as written. I have summarised my main concerns below and provided some amendments to the proposal for consideration:

:*[1] - As I have stated in the previous discussion, WP:NCAUST is not specific enough by saying that articles may use just {{xt|"placename"}}. This does not provide sufficient clarity around when it is appropriate to omit or include the state/territory. This has resulted in a number of grouped RMs being opened on the grounds of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, however these discussions had limited participation, particular outside of Australian editors or those with a local interest. This proposal goes some way to address this by preventing RMs being opened on the basis of PRIMARYTOPIC alone. However, it does still not provide specific guidance around when state/territory should or should not be included.

:*[2] - see my proposed amendments below

:*[3], [4], [5] - Support as proposed.

:*[6] - Disagree. For new articles, the convention should continue to be {{xt|"placename, state"}}, except in cases where it is unambiguous (such as indigenous placenames). I refer to the many previous RMs at Talk:Mosman. While it was successfully argued in the most recent RM that the name is unique, several previous RMs also concluded that disambiguation was necessary to differentiate from Mossman, Queensland due to a very similar spelling (in fact, some historic sources use the same spelling for both places). Another example would be Castlecrag, New South Wales, which does appear to be unique and was listed in an RM, but was not moved as editors pointed out that there are numerous other places and landmarks with their own articles called Castle Crag/Castle Crags/Castlecrag Mountain/Castlecraig. A convention that requires disambiguation as the default would issues like the above, without requiring places like Ulladulla be unnecessarily disambiguated.

:*[7] - I have some reservations with regards to not restoring any of the recent changes that resulted from the RMs of large groups of articles. When I raised with closers that these RMs should be considered with caution in light of these ongoing discussions. Several closers were of the view that any changes could easily be reverted if a clear consensus emerged here. However, 7.1 and 7.2 appears to close the door on this entirely and locks in inconsistency, especially if the premise that PRIMARYTOPIC alone is not justification for a name change going forward.

:*[8] - I think we should drop 8, as I strongly believe that consistency should be something we strive for. As already stated at [7], we should only deviate from an agreed standard where there is a clear reason to do so. Most people reading an encyclopedia expect it to be formatted in a consistent way as that makes information easier to find. Codifying it this way allows deviation from style conventions because it is easier in some cases (or because an editor may not be aware of places outside of their home state/country with similar names) and harms the project overall.

:* [9], [10], [11] - Support as proposed.

SUGGESTED AMENDMENT TO PROPOSAL

{{box|wide=yes|background=white|

Australian Settled Places (towns, cities, suburbs, localities etc.)

Inserts the following text in place of [2], while the existing text becomes [2.1};

:*Where a place name is clearly unambiguous, {{xt|"placename"}} may be used alone. This includes when the name is clearly unique, such as most indigenous place names; where the place is a capital or major regional city and also satisfies WP:PRIMARYTOPIC; or where there is otherwise no potential for confusion with another place (including outside of Australia), landmark or subject. In all other cases, {{xt|"placename, state"}} should be used as the default. This includes where there are similarly named places that vary only in spelling or spaces (eg. Castlecrag, New South Wales and Castle Crag, or Broadmeadow, New South Wales and Broadmeadows, Victoria

::* [2.1] Where the place name has or is likely to have other uses, a link from the appropriate disambiguation page should be made (eg. Darwin contains a link to Darwin, Northern Territory, and Kingston contains links to several Australian towns).

Moving / Renaming Existing Articles

: [7] For existing articles, renaming from one name form to the other should not be done unless there is some other good reason to do it

::* [7.1] existing articles using {{xt|"placename, state"}} should not be renamed just because the state-name disambiguation is reckoned unnecessary, nor because WP:PRIMARYTOPIC allows it. nor based on an argument for 'consistency' with practice outside Australia

::* [7.2] existing articles using {{xt|"placename"}} should only be renamed where it is clearly necessary for disambiguation.

}} Dfadden (talk) 12:58, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

: Thanks {{u|Dfadden}} for the detailed and considered response.

: My commentary on your comments (on my ... aagh! ;-) ):

:* [1] - My draft was just an introductory statement, and I don't think you are suggesting any re-wording.

:* [2] - in preference to my initial 'either form ... is acceptable' for new articles (my [6]), I'm happy to use your new [2] lines, though they possibly need a little further tightening up (remove 'may'?) to be more definite statements of when to use which form.

::* The 'reasons for just placename' and 'reasons for placename, state' can be separate points

::* I take your point about similar names (spelling and spaces) justifiying disambiguation. It's worth separating as a sub-point, with my initial [2] (your [2.1]), and [3], [4] and [5] as further sub-points.

:* [6] - dropped, see above

:* [7] - re: your re-wordings of [7.1] and [7.2], I agree with both of them.

:* Re your comments on reverting recent moves, I don't want to start another battle over how far we go back and do this. The wiki-lawyer in me says 'what was done was done under the old rules, let it stand', though for the very recent ones (those that acknowledge this discussion) if they want to apply the new rules instead of the old ones, that would be valid too.

:* [8] - Was intended just as a historical note explaining why we have the inconsistency we do. If you read it as justifying inconsistency, that was not my intention. Would 'Historical Note' help as a heading?

:* Re consistency generally, yes it would be great (I presume everybody supports it as a principle), but for existing Australian-place articles I think we have now missed that boat.

:* I've realised that, with the restrictions we are putting on renaming existing articles, most of the detailed guidelines on how to name an article only apply to new articles - so in the following draft I've moved the 'New Articles' heading to above [2]. Hopefully this will prevent statements about how to name articles being regarded as 'general', and used in RM arguments.

So, DRAFT 3 (just the 'naming of settled places articles' section) in short form (all full texts are above):

{{box|wide=yes|background=white|

: [1] Articles about Australian settled places may have names in one of two forms: {{xt|"placename, state"}} or {{xt|"placename"}}.

: New Articles

:* [2] Where a place name is clearly ... landmark or subject.

:* [2.0] In all other cases ... default.

::* [2.1] Where the place name has or is likely to have other uses ... Australian towns).

::* [2.2] This includes where there are similarly named places ... Broadmeadows, Victoria.

::* [3] Where {{xt|"placename, state"}} is used, a redirect from {{xt|"placename"}} ... Wagga).

::* [4] Where the {{xt|"placename, state"}} form still has conflicts ... multiple LGAs.

::* [5] State or territory names should not be abbreviated in article titles.

: Existing Articles

:* [7.1] Existing articles using {{xt|"placename, state"}} should not be renamed just because the state-name disambiguation is reckoned unnecessary, nor because WP:PRIMARYTOPIC allows it.

:* [7.2] Existing articles using {{xt|"placename"}} should only be renamed where it is clearly necessary for disambiguation.

: [8] Historical Note: ... forms are accepted.

}}

Innesw (talk) 23:42, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose WP:NCAUST is fine as it is, Additionaly, we should not be having seperate rules for new and exisiting articles. GMH Melbourne (talk) 00:16, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

:Support (3rd draft) text and creating the new page Wikipedia:Naming Conventions (Australian Places)

:– MrAussieGuy (Talk) 01:14, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

• Broad support. I was deeply involved in the original establishment of the standard naming of settlement articles in the form ", " many years ago. It created then and continues to provide confidence for editors that they are not creating duplicate articles, and reduces the chance of inadvertently linking to wrong or disambiguation pages due to a word being clearly a placename for that editor, but clearly something else or somewhere else for other people. The convention also provides a reliable single title for future articles that have not been written yet, without risk of future events creating a new "primary topic" for a name. I have always regarded ", " as a qualifying term, not just a disambiguator. It's a necessary part of an address. The undermining and chipping away at the standard naming convention contributed to me taking my first long wikibreak for mental health reasons. Centralising the guidelines to one unambiguous source of guidance (Proposal part A) should prevent multiple slightly different versions being used to create doubt and foment uncertainty. While I'm disappointed there are so many pages already moved, I support a clear statement that the status quo should remain and new articles continue to be created as ", " with redirects if necessary. --Scott Davis ^Talk 02:31, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
• Support though my preference is for location, state as default I can accept this wording in Draft 3. Gnangarra 04:25, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

:Oppose section [7.1] Probably would be better if it was written like "You may, but are not required to" or something like that Servite et contribuere (talk) 12:37, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

::Happy to consider alternative wording, but I oppose the use of the word "may". After all, this whole dispute arises because WP:NCAUST is too vague in saying {{tq|...the name of a city or town may be used alone if the place is the primary or only topic for that name}}. We really need something definitive or we are going to end up with more of the same. How about something like:

::[7.1] Existing articles using "placename, state" should not be renamed unless there is a compelling reason to do so (eg. not just because WP:PRIMARYTOPIC allows it)? Dfadden (talk) 10:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Claim of overriding policy The claim has been made at one of the current move discussions that "[This] RFC is not going to change anything about WP:PTOPIC which is a controlling guideline sitting above any local consensus." I presume this is not in fact the case, as it would invalidate not only any Australian convention but presumably also the convention in the US. Innesw (talk) 12:28, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Officer South, Victoria#Requested move 6 June 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 08:48, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

:I've requested this is reverted per WP:BADNAC given the open RfC above. If members of this WP who have participated in the RfC are going to !vote on these RMs, can we at least provide a note for the closer that the RfC is running? We have yet to determine consensus here! Dfadden (talk) 22:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Melbourne Storm has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:57, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

I noticed Lake Monger was moved to Galup but it was previously at Lake Monger, Western Australia where it first created. If you are moving pages please atke the time to clean up all the redirects. I have just done all the double rediects that started at Lake Monger, Western Australia there are still 50 odd rediects at Lake Monger. This kind of mess is left behind everytime a page gets moved, if you start request take the time fix the double redirects and all the text within articles which need to altered. Page moves are more than titles, then there are categories and all the links through other projects that need to be addressed.

Perhaps we should be able to decline a move if the person doesnt do the necessary clean-up afterwards Gnangarra 13:51, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:NRL Grand Final#Requested move 2 June 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 07:33, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Indian cricket team in Australia in 2024–25 #Requested move 21 June 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Servite et contribuere (talk) 21:33, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Niecon Developments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as Unreferenced and unimproved for 14 and 1/2 years. Non-notable company per WP:CORP and WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 20:54, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

This might be more of a Commons thing, but I'll ask here because I'm after the thoughts of Australians - what is the copyright state of images of election material (pamphlets/brochures, etc)? I'm guessing full scans of the content is not allowed, what about photographs of the brochures? Opened or just the front? I notice the category Political advertising in Australia only has corflute photos and no brochures/pamphlets at all, I'm not sure if that's because it isn't permitted or simply no-one has done it! -- Chuq (talk) 09:59, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg There is a requested move discussion at Talk:M4 motorway (Sydney)#Requested move 23 June 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 14:01, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

SBS has [https://www.sbs.com.au/food/article/50-food-changemakers-australia/3wgqhm3jk released a list] of {{green|50 of the most important people in food in our country}}. I looked through and found a few names which didn't have articles; I've listed some below with some sources that demonstrate notability and can be used to write an article:

Alla Wolf-Tasker

• Australian Financial Review: [http://archive.today/20240429235343/https://www.afr.com/life-and-luxury/food-and-wine/it-was-sheer-madness-how-alla-wolf-tasker-created-the-lake-house-20240410-p5fioq ‘It was sheer madness’: how Alla Wolf-Tasker created the Lake House]
• The Australian Women's Weekly: [https://www.womensweekly.com.au/news/real-life/alla-wolf-tasker-lake-house-daylesford/ Alla Wolf-Tasker and Lake House Daylesford’s legacy of love]
• The Sydney Morning Herald: [http://archive.today/20250528121147/https://www.smh.com.au/business/profile-alla-wolf-tasker-20061108-gdorvg.html Profile: Alla Wolf-Tasker]

Andrew McConnell

• The Sydney Morning Herald: [http://archive.today/20250626052347/https://www.smh.com.au/goodfood/eating-out/the-three-wise-mcconnells-20171206-h0012z.html Three wise McConnells: How three chef brothers conquered Australian dining]
• Australian Financial Review: [https://www.afr.com/life-and-luxury/food-and-wine/andrew-mcconnell-still-reinventing-melbournes-dining-scene-after-17-years-20180313-h0xe2q Andrew McConnell: still reinventing Melbourne's dining scene after 17 years]
• The Sydney Morning Herald: [http://archive.today/20250626054058/https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/chef-andrew-mcconnell-on-his-parenthood-privacy-and-whether-sydney-beckons-20160316-gnkr0l.html Chef Andrew McConnell on his parenthood, privacy and whether Sydney beckons]

Analiese Gregory

• Special Broadcasting Service: [https://www.sbs.com.au/food/article/analiese-gregory-girls-guide/xx097mj8i "One day I'd like to be a wild woman."]
• The Sydney Morning Herald: [http://archive.today/20250626054726/https://www.smh.com.au/goodfood/eating-out/chef-analiese-gregory-cow-whisperer-quiet-achiever-hedgehog-saint-20180405-h0yd7f.html Chef Analiese Gregory: Cow whisperer, quiet achiever, hedgehog saint]
• Artful Magazine: [https://artfulliving.com/chef-analiese-gregory-tasmania-recipe/ Inside Chef Analiese Gregory’s Untamed Tasmanian Life]

Christine Manfield

• The Sydney Morning Herald: [http://archive.today/20250626055324/https://www.smh.com.au/national/culinary-nomad-christine-manfield-leads-the-way-again-20181126-p50iei.html Culinary nomad: Christine Manfield leads the way – again]
• National Portrait Gallery (Australia): [https://www.portrait.gov.au/portraits/1999.66/christine-manfield Christine Mansfield]
• The Canberra Times: [https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/130561830? Passion, care and integrity]

Jill Dupleix

• Toronto Star: [https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/jill-dupleix-s-food-is-simply-delicious/docview/438656357/ Jill Dupleix's food is simply delicious] (accessible via The Wikipedia Library)
• The Age: [http://archive.today/20250626082225/https://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/jill-dupleix-keeping-it-simple-20020322-gdu2gt.html Jill Dupleix: keeping it simple]
• The Sydney Morning Herald: [http://archive.today/2025.06.26-083031/https://www.smh.com.au/business/profile-jill-dupleix-20070307-gdplsc.html Profile: Jill Dupleix]

Josh Niland

• ABC News (Australia): [https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-13/chef-josh-niland-path-to-become-australias-fish-butcher/103771978 Australia's Josh Niland is 'one of the most interesting chefs on the planet'. This is his secret ingredient]
• National Geographic: [https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/josh-niland-sydney-fish Meet Josh Niland, the Australian chef who started a fish revolution]
• Australian Financial Review: [http://archive.today/20250609025025/https://www.afr.com/life-and-luxury/food-and-wine/love-at-first-bite-meet-australia-s-hospitality-power-couples-20250325-p5lm9u Meet Australia’s hospitality power couples]

Kate Reid (chef)

• ABC News (Australia): [https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-11/lune-kate-reid-croissants-formula-1-engineer/101718294 Kate Reid was a Formula 1 engineer. Now people line up for hours to eat her croissants]
• The Sydney Morning Herald: [http://archive.today/20240507074552/https://www.smh.com.au/goodfood/eating-out/a-day-in-a-life-of-kate-reid-owner-of--lune-croissanterie-20221028-h27ghz.html Master of the Luniverse: A day in the life of Kate Reid, owner of Lune Croissanterie]
• The New York Times: [http://archive.today/20250314112703/https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6201684/2025/03/14/f1-australian-gp-croissants-kate-reid/ Meet the former F1 engineer behind the ‘world’s best croissant']

Nornie Bero

• National Geographic: [https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/pioneer-nornie-bero-native-australian-ingredients The pioneer: Nornie Bero on championing native Australian ingredients]
• National Indigenous Times: [https://nit.com.au/28-12-2024/15578/the-chef-championing-native-foods-from-island-backyards The chef championing native foods from island backyards]
• Australian Financial Review: [http://archive.today/20250626104015/https://www.afr.com/life-and-luxury/food-and-wine/chef-nornie-bero-wants-you-to-try-these-really-great-indigenous-drinks-20220622-p5avt9 Chef Nornie Bero wants you to try these really great Indigenous drinks]

Palisa Anderson

• The Sydney Morning Herald: [http://archive.today/20250626104438/https://www.smh.com.au/goodfood/eating-out/wild-women-of-food-20180301-h0wua8.html Wild women of food: The suppliers, teachers, chefs, growers and brewers breaking the mould]
• Australian Financial Review: [http://archive.today/20250626104533/https://www.afr.com/life-and-luxury/food-and-wine/the-woman-behind-chat-thai-s-secret-ingredients-20190607-p51vli The woman behind Chat Thai's secret ingredients]
• Time Out: [https://www.timeout.com/sydney/things-to-do/time-outs-food-and-drink-future-shaper-palisa-anderson Time Out's Food and Drink Future Shaper: Palisa Anderson]

Shannon Martinez

• Broadsheet: [https://www.broadsheet.com.au/featured/shannon-martinez-in-survival-mode-new-italian-cookbook Shannon Martinez Is in Survival Mode (but Pasta Helps)]
• Fashion Journal: [https://fashionjournal.com.au/life/chef-shannon-martinez-career/ How I Got Here: Melbourne chef Shannon Martinez on not being taken seriously in the food industry]
• Australian Financial Review: [http://archive.today/20250626105338/https://www.afr.com/life-and-luxury/smith--daughters-chef-shannon-martinez-grills-mexican-chef-rosio-sanchez-20190227-h1bro2 Smith & Daughters chef Shannon Martinez grills Mexican chef Rosio Sanchez]

Shaun Christie-David

• The Sydney Morning Herald: [http://archive.today/20240126104125/https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/is-the-job-satisfaction-better-100-per-cent-why-shaun-christie-david-turned-his-back-on-banking-20231201-p5eocr.html ‘Is the job satisfaction better? 100 per cent’: Why this boss doesn’t mind being broke]
• Special Broadcasting Service: [https://www.sbs.com.au/food/the-cook-up-with-adam-liaw/article/how-shaun-christie-david-turned-mealtime-embarrassment-into-a-social-enterprise/co5kjud3b How Shaun Christie-David turned mealtime embarrassment into a social enterprise]
• ABC News (Australia): [https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-20/shaun-christie-david-restaurant-giving-away-half-a-million-meals/103771986 Plating it forward]

We have images for:

• [https://www.flickr.com/photos/visitmelbourne/15613304677 Alla Wolf-Tasker]
• Andrew McConnell
• [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihqgFYfwAK0 Josh Niland]
• [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKJ3Y2I3CP8 Kate Reid]
• [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_KhM9jc1hE Nornie Bero]
• [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odB0uGx7fdY Palisa Anderson]

Rollinginhisgrave (talk | contributions) 11:14, 26 June 2025 (UTC)