Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BunnysBot 4

{{Newbot|BunnysBot|4}}

Operator: {{botop|Bunnypranav}}

Time filed: 15:54, Saturday, December 14, 2024 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: Use AWB auto tagging

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): Weekly runs

Estimated number of pages affected: 50-100 each run

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Firstly, I am already approved to use Auto Tagging and GenFixes with the first bot task. That was mainly based upon CW errors, so I have decided to get explicit approval on running tasks primarily based on Auto Tagging. This is also similar to BattyBot's first task.

Specifics:

• Removal of {{t|orphan}} from Database reports/Orphans with incoming links, of which I run a userpage report at User:Bunnypranav/DeOrphan using same code.
• Change {{tl|No footnotes}} to {{tl|More footnotes needed}} from articles with at least one footnote. Run against articles in the monthly subcategories of :Category:Articles lacking sources. Will also add {{tl|Reflist}} and heading with GenFixes for articles lacking one.
• Merge supported templates into {{tl|Multiple issues}}. Run against articles that have {{tl|Multiple issues}}.

Appropriate skip options for cosmetic, no changes, only whitespace changes will be applied.

• Question: Will the bot know the difference between content and tracking categories, or hidden and visible categories? For example, if an article has the category {{cl|CS1 maint: url-status}} as its only category and has the {{t|Uncategorized}} template, what will it do? (Hint: The article should remain tagged as Uncategorized.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonesey95 (talk • contribs) 05:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
• :{{ping|Jonesey95}} As this is just using AWB autotagger and I did not write any code, I am not sure of the exact technicalities. As per my understanding, such tracking cats should be ignored by AWB. I am open for any testing with specific pages if you can provide them. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:30, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
• ::I looked for sample articles, but I guess I'm confused. Why are you proposing to run a category-related task on :Category:Articles lacking sources? I don't [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=incategory%3A%22Articles+lacking+sources%22+hastemplate%3AUncategorized&title=Special%3ASearch&ns0=1&ns4=1&ns10=1&ns12=1 see any relevant articles].
• ::I see only [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=hastemplate%3AUncategorized&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1 36 articles that have the Uncategorized template]. I don't think that batch needs a bot run. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:17, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
• :::{{ping|Jonesey95}} Thanks for your observation. The ref cat was added by mistake. Anyways, after a few searching of my own, I have removed that sub task and added a new one for new pages tagging. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bunnypranav (talk • contribs) 15:57, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

{{od|:::}}

• Small update, I have changed the task list again ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
• {{BotTrial|edits=50}} Primefac (talk) 13:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• :{{BotTrialComplete}} [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions&target=BunnysBot&namespace=0&tagfilter=&start=&start=&end=&end=&limit=50&offset=20250101154530001 50 edits] No errors that I can see. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
• ::@Bunnypranav: Is this also meant to do the General Fix that changes {{tl|Unreferenced}} to {{tl|More citations needed}} if there's at least one source? Came across this bot while keeping an eye on :Category:All articles lacking sources. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 00:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
• :::@ARandomName123 Yes, that is also being done using the Auto Tagging feature of AWB. See Special:Diff/1266637064, an edit during this trial. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
• ::{{t|BAG assistance needed}} ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
• :::I am disinclined to approve this task. Of the first ten edits I looked at, five of them were purely cosmetic edits. This is not an acceptable failure rate. Primefac (talk) 12:35, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
• ::::@Primefac Apologies for the cosmetic edits. Can I get an extended trial? I will change the way I create lists to exclude such failures. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
• :::::{{BotExtendedTrial|edits=50}} Primefac (talk) 12:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
• ::::::{{BotTrialComplete}} [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/BunnysBot?limit=50&offset=20250123125432001 50 edits] and not a single cosmetic that I could find, thanks to a change in the skip options. I believe that solves it Primefac? ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
• :::::::{{BotApproved}} Primefac (talk) 15:46, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard.