Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/CrazynasBot

I would like to expand my AWB run bot to have it to subst user talk warnings in that namespace, per Wikipedia:Subst. I have been running it in for a while in manual, with no problems so far. Crazynas ^t 02:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

:You do realize that we already have at least 4 bots (mine included) doing this, right? alphaChimp ^laudare 02:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

::I also realize that when I loaded up my script in AWB there were around 60 pages to subst... if you have ideas for other things I can do, I'd be more then happy to listen. :). Crazynas ^t 02:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

:::Haha. Nah it's no problem. You can always check the Wikipedia:Bot requests page. Quite frankly, I don't think there's anything particularly wrong with having another bot subst'ing usertalk messages. Xaosflux - you agree? alphaChimp ^laudare 03:28, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

::::No problem having more of these, just makes for shorter runs, risk of bot collision is minimal at this. 1 week trial approved, post difs when complete. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• Operator pinged, — xaosflux ^Talk 15:12, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

:Diff's (selected at random from the contribs history): [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wjlkgnsfb&diff=prev&oldid=71893570], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Estonofunciona&diff=prev&oldid=67556582], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mondomedeusah&diff=prev&oldid=67554304], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AaronS&diff=prev&oldid=67555736] Good? Crazynas ^t 22:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

• APPROVED — xaosflux ^Talk 01:25, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.